Friday, July 23, 2010

Haiti, at last

When I last went to India, in 2007, my father, sister, and I spent a week teaching lessons at a dirt-poor public school in Madras—the kind in which some children don’t even have shoes to wear, where they are sent principally so they will get a square meal at lunch. I was essentially useless, as my Tamil skills extend to the phrase “I understand, but I don’t speak” and the names of certain obscure vegetables (“winter squash,” anyone?) Regardless, the kids and we became instant friends. On the last day of class, after bidding them goodbye, we were about to leave when a little boy walked up to us, shyly, with a pen in hand. “For you,” he said. The rest of the group immediately followed suit, giving us the precious possessions of which they had so little—pictures of deities, candies, even an entire set of markers (the holy grail of school supplies). I was reminded of that scene again and again this week in Haiti; there, nominally at least, to do a weeklong service project, I ended up being its real benefactor.


The first thing I saw at the airport in Port-au-Prince, before getting on the bus to the baggage claim.

It’s beyond evident to call the deadly earthquake of January 12 a devastation, the kind of horrific unthinkable event you read about in the papers, follow for a couple of weeks, donate money to in order to assuage your own liberal guilt, and ultimately forget about. (At least, this was exactly what I had done.) It is entirely different to visit a Haitian school turned church turned post-quake orphanage and see half of a blackboard with the chalk-written words mardi 12 janvier 2010 written at the top, the beginnings of a vocabulary lesson inscribed below—a lesson that would be chillingly, eternally unfinished.

This chalkboard now serves as a partition between the pharmacy and the room used as the doctor's office.

Six months have passed since 12 janvier 2010, and the streets are still covered in debris. Sturdy buildings and undamaged houses stand alongside caved-in churches and schools that have been reduced to piles of rubble. Amidst the ruins of one house, we made out the mangled remains of a blue Toyota, a dining table, chairs: those jarring remnants of normalcy, pictures of what daily life was once like in Haiti before being so cruelly interrupted. When we were driving back from our medical camp, we passed the ruins of the once-majestic Grand Palace, perhaps the symbol of Haiti’s devastation. Opposite to it was one of Haiti’s ubiquitous encampments: neat grids of tents (from all over, UNICEF to USAID to the People’s Republic of China) that now serve as the homes for over one million Haitians. “See that?” one of our translators asked, pointing towards the encampment. “That used to be a place to walk around, read, play. It was beautiful.”

Today, walking into that space, you’d be more likely to see thousands upon thousands of people sharing a single water source, crammed into tents without the smallest semblance of privacy, looking at you, their eyes reflecting pain, weariness, a little curiosity. You’d see damp, sticky litter strewn all over the ground, from empty rum bottles to condom wrappers to torn pieces of playing cards, filth between each row of tents. You’d snap on a pair of surgical gloves—totally inadequate for the job at hand, tearing just as you were picking up a particularly wet, wormy, unidentifiable piece of trash—hold a Glad bag, and get to work cleaning as the merciless Haitian sun beat down on your back. Just as you’d cleaned an entire row, you’d look at the crevasse behind the encampment, only to see it turned into a makeshift dump of sorts, overflowing with about a thousand times the garbage you’d just spent an hour picking up. You leave the rest of your Glad bags and gloves there.


Examples of tents from the encampments; above, from USAID ("From the American People"), below, from the People's Republic of China.

It is easy to focus on the negative in Haiti; the country has been so spectacularly blighted that an old tale about how it made a pact with the devil still has traction today. Once France’s wealthiest colony, the country became the first in the Western Hemisphere to abolish slavery (see, e.g., Toussaint L’Ouverture, slave rebellion), after a long and tough revolutionary war ended in 1801. Those idealists who would have hoped that this would begin a wave of enlightenment across the hemisphere would be sadly mistaken: not only did slavery go on for nearly seventy more years in the United States, but our always-upstanding government refused to recognize the country for fear of inspiring a similar rebellion stateside. That is, until we occupied it in the twentieth century for three decades and left it in the hands of corrupt dictatorships that lasted well into the nineteen-eighties. Add to these corrupted political institutions deforestation, overpopulation, primary school education onward in a mandated foreign language (French) as opposed to Creole, and of course, a score of natural disasters, and you almost begin to believe those whispers of an ancient devil pact.

The airport is named for Toussaint L'Ouverture, rebel and hero.

When I first arrived in Haiti, all I could think about was the negative. Every pile of rubble, every encampment, every sighting of the ubiquitous UN peacekeeping forces (which just angered me more: where was the food? Where was the medical aid? Why were resources being wasted like this?) As I was riding in the back of the pickup truck we took to the medical camp every day, a small Haitian child jumped up onto the ledge of the truck as it was moving. “Please. I’m so hungry.” We had a cab full of medical supplies and not a bite of food to give him. “I’m sorry, please get down, it’s dangerous,” a volunteer replied. When we got home—dinner ready on the table—I locked myself in the bathroom and cried.

_______


Something happened a couple of days in. Yoga instructors talk a lot about “gaining strength from your neighbors” when you’re having difficulty, channeling their energy and making it yours, whatever: something that has always seemed a little hokey and New Age to me. But the Haitians, easily the warmest, most resilient people I have encountered, really did give me theirs. Literally every single one of them has been touched by the earthquake of January 12; they survived by sheer luck, chance decisions not to go to work or school that day, fate. Or they were trapped under rubble, sure goners, but somehow made it. There was the story of the Haitian student, who described walking to his university building, watching it crumble suddenly with eight hundred students inside: among them his friends, his teachers. There was the story of the sweet woman employed as a cook in the house we were staying in Delmas (the house having been graciously opened to us by a local Haitian man, who reminded me of an especially benevolent, Creole-speaking Dumbledore.) This woman had been visiting her niece at the hospital, when the walls suddenly collapsed all around her and the ceiling above her; she emerged, having pushed herself through a narrow tunnel, twelve hours later, a living being among the bodies strewn about the building.

And yet, as much as the emotional and physical stresses of having survived such an event linger—our clinic doctors diagnosed more post-traumatic stress disorder and high blood pressure than anything else, prescribing bright pink anti-allergy tablets for the scores and scores of patients who couldn’t sleep at night—the people are still passionate about and proud of their country, eager to help rebuild it, to do their part; from them, I learned to try to do the same. Every weekday, I worked at one of two churches: “Big Church,” as we called it, where one hundred patients sat in pews, our pharmacy a small storage closet, our doctor’s office a table to the left of the pulpit; “small church” was the church-turned-school-turned orphanage, where the patients sat upstairs, and the orphaned children singing songs downstairs would simultaneously break and mend my heart.

These three little guys from the orphanage loved the camera.

After the evening’s harrowing ride from the clinic to the house in the back of the pickup truck (you’ve got to cultivate your “truck legs” much like you would your sea legs), we’d begin work with an incredible local youth group from the neighborhood. The group formed in 2009 to combat the social problems that plagued the country even before the earthquake. (They call themselves “FAST Plan”: the “FAST” stands for Framework for Attaining a Social Transformation; how cool is that?) Since January 12, they’ve focused more on clean-up projects (they set up the encampment clean-up at which I volunteered), water distribution projects, even a project aimed at constructing a primary school for one hundred children from the Delmas neighborhood. (They do this in addition to regular work at school or university.) And they’re between eighteen and twenty-four years old.

This sign, which I snapped in the car on my way from the airport, speaks to one of Haiti's bigger socioeconomic problems: the often-higher cost of local goods.

While the youth group isn’t religious, it is definitely spiritual: meetings always began with a pretty French prayer. God definitely pervades Haiti, if not in spirit, then certainly in letter: in prayer, in song, in conversation, even painted in bright blue letters (“Dieu bénévole”) on the fronts of the colorful tap-taps, the tiny covered trucks that serve as Haiti’s public transportation. Medical clinic always started with a chant; partings ended with the words “May God bless you.” Any recounting of an earthquake survival story always included mentions of God’s grace, God’s benevolence, God’s protection. Although I think the term “reverent agnostic” (heavy on the ‘reverent’, as I was raised in a religious household) fits my belief system better than anything else, I found myself chafing at the idea of God’s supposed omnipresence in a country that looked to me like God (provided s/he even existed) had completely jumped ship, fallen asleep, feigned ignorance while nature cruelly shook the country with all its might. “Are you a believer?” a translator asked me (that’s how they always ask in French: not if you’re religious, but if you’re a croyant/e.) “I’m not sure,” I responded honestly. “That’s not good!” he chided me. “It’s good to believe. I pray every day.”

In the evenings, our Haitian host would often teach us songs, one of which had a lovely, haunting melody and went, I think, along the lines of, Prions pour la paix d’Haïti (Pray for the peace of Haiti). He sang it, like he sang everything, beautifully, a little sadly, movingly, the way only someone who really believed the words could. And all of a sudden I had a feeling that my anemic, intellectual quasi-agnosticism—being as it is, the lack of a belief—wasn’t strong enough to weather Haiti. The Haitian faith in God is so ubiquitous because it inspires, unites, moves, solaces. It isn’t really about the object of the faith at all, but the faith itself; whether or not God exists, whether or not he or she or it has continually left Haiti in the lurch, faith in God and good is, paradoxically, the groundswell for the Haitians’ indomitable strength.

That song played over and over again in my head on my flight back from Port-au-Prince, a surreal undercurrent as I arrived back in Dallas, almost as though it was reminding me to remember the country I had feared and then fallen in love with, the people who’d helped me more than I could ever help them.

Prions pour la paix d’Haïti.

Love at first sight. This was after they'd sung a "Welcome" song in Creole-glish I wish I could post here!

Saturday, July 17, 2010

Crime and Punishment

Let's not and say we did. Sorry, Raskolnikov, but 200 pages is punishment enough.

Friday, July 2, 2010

H(ait)iatus

Tomorrow--at the truly ungodly hour of 5:45 am--I leave for Port-au-Prince! I've optimistically stuffed the following volumes into my bag: Midnight's Children (Rushdie), The Road (McCarthy), Atonement (McEwan), The Bell Jar (Plath), and Crime and Punishment (Dostoevsky, and really slow going so far, by the way), but I'm anticipating that at least seven of the eight hours I spend traveling will involve my face on the tray table.

I am beyond excited about going to Haiti (although still not entirely sure what work I'll be doing once I get there, since it varies week to week). Obviously, once I am there, the only book I'll be using is my tattered little French dictionary--and even that probably not too much, since (I believe) Creole is more commonly spoken. I'll be sure to post updates and pictures whenever I can; electricity is intermittent, as is internet access, so "whenever I can" might actually not be until a week from tomorrow.

I know whatever I do will be a miniscule drop in a truly impossible bucket--Haiti is so broken, facing an entire litany of problems from disaster relief to political corruption. But, well, "to choose doubt as a philosophy is akin to choosing immobility as a means of transportation." (That's from Life of Pi.)

So I go, hopefully to do something, definitely to learn something. And until then, orévwa!






Monday, June 28, 2010

Nominations and names

My mom--one of two creatures genetically obligated to love everything I create--recently complained that my Book a Day blog is "too legal-y." She's probably right; my list of 45 reveals an overwhelming selection bias in favor of all things court-related.

Well, Mom, I hate to do this to you, but my weekend read was Supreme Courtship, a Christopher Buckley satire about the nomination process to the highest court in the land. I've loved Buckley ever since reading Thank You for Smoking, and I resolved to read his other stuff after a very amusing talk he gave at my university ("Did you know," he quipped at one point, "that the title Grapes of Wrath was originally translated into Japanese as Angry Raisins?")

The plot of Supreme Courtship is typical Buckley: a milquetoast president with low approval ratings has been struggling to fill a vacancy on the Supreme Court. His arch-nemesis is the head of the Senate Judiciary Committee, a pompous, veneered windbag (written to have more than a passing resemblance to Joe Biden) who has systematically rejected every nominee put forth by the president--including one for "insufficiently appreciating To Kill a Mockingbird." Fed up, the president tries another tack, nominating America's most popular TV judge, a cowboy boots-wearing Texan named Pepper, who is a self-described "plain old girl from Plano" (my hometown! Holla.) Hijinks ensue.

The book definitely had me giggling and was a timely read, given the usual charade of this week's confirmation hearings. ("Kagan promises a 'modest' jurisprudence," bellows the New York Times headline. Let me guess--analogies to umpires and worship at the altar of judicial restraintism are next on the hearings agenda.) In one chapter, Pepper is given a huge book of possible questions to prepare for her hearings, along with answers, which seem to her to represent nothing so much as "smoke grenades of obfuscation." I couldn't put it better.

Ultimately, though, although it starts strong, the book loses steam towards the end, like a bottle of soda that's been left open too long on the countertop. I still enjoyed it (I also really enjoyed flat Sprite as a kid, believe it or not), and would recommend it for anyone who likes their beach reads a little "legal-y."

My other weekend read, Edith Wharton's Age of Innocence, did the opposite--beginning slowly before reaching a climactic, dramatic end. The book was interesting enough as a depiction of Old New York, a decadent, privileged society in which nothing matters more than family name (the protagonist bears the absurdly upper-crust moniker Newland Archer), during a time when "scandal was dreaded more than disease." Cue the scandal--Archer, betrothed to the boringly beautiful May, falls in love with her exotic, rules-flouting, recently-separated, Polish countess cousin. This all sounds more interesting than it is, as the plot rolls by at a snail's pace with a cast of side-characters whose family connections are a tangled web (apparently incest was big in Old New York). Not to mention that it's hard to identify all that much with characters who spend their days worrying about the state of their cigar humidors and summer homes. (Or maybe it's just my hard-heartedness: Visiting room after gilt-covered room in the palace of Versailles inspired in me nothing so much as a deep sympathy for those nameless, revolting peasants.) A better title might have been Privileged People with Nothing to Do.

The ending, though, was redeeming. Consider it flat Sprite in the reverse.










Thursday, June 24, 2010

The halfway point

I looked at my reading list today and realized I'm a little less than halfway through my Book a Day Project! It's been alternately exhilarating and dreary (depending, of course, on the book). I'm behind (no surprise there). I've managed to update this thing semi-regularly, but hardly as often as I was supposed to (they say creative types can't stick to a schedule, and I'm sticking with that).

A friend asked me if I wake up, pick up a book, start reading, and don't finish until 11pm the same day, or, alternatively, if I "knock out that one Russian mofo's War and Peace in an hour." Ha. The truth, as someone once said, lies in between. Depending on how Zen I feel and how interesting the book is, hundreds of pages can pass by in the span of a couple of hours; on other days, everything becomes a distraction and a single chapter is the literary equivalent of Mount Everest.

Last week, my lovely sister, who as of late has been enslaved to the medical profession (even disembarking from the plane in a particularly smelly pair of scrubs--JUST KIDDING, Jan, they didn't smell AT ALL), came into town, meaning that the whole family was together again for the first time since Christmas! So obviously much time usually devoted to the greats of fiction and non-fiction was, instead, spent eating and gossiping and eating again (we are Indian, after all) and figuring out how to use the auto-timer on the new camera for a family portrait ("HURRY DAD! You've only got ten seconds, and Mom, if you blink this time...!") Despite the 24/8 family time (and I do mean 24/8) I did manage to squeeze in a couple of good reads you should absolutely add to your lists if you haven't already devoured them.

The first was Salinger's Nine Stories. I have a love-hate thing with short stories. On one hand, done well, they are great works of art in miniature. On the other, they are almost always deliberately unfinished--leaving you, the reader, unsatisfied, wanting more (especially true regarding Salinger's entire opus, since the famously reclusive author published so little of what he wrote). Salinger's short stories are funny and wise, dark and mordant; my favorite was Teddy, the final story in the collection, which is Vedantic philosophy as seen through the eyes of a six-year-old boy genius. All are crisply written, economical, provocative: there's no doubt that the recently-deceased author was a master of the form.

I also squeezed in the ubiquitous Life of Pi, whose book jacket simply says "This book will make you believe in God." (A tall order.) The book traces the journey of Pi, moored at sea on a lifeboat with a Bengal tiger (I'd explain, but you really should read it.) It is a classic survivor story with deliciously fantastical elements--in some ways reminiscent of Homer's Odyssey. I enjoyed it quite a bit, and leave you with this observation of Pi's:

"I must say a word about fear. It is life's only true opponent. Only fear can defeat life."

A good thing to remember at the halfway point of anything.




Thursday, June 17, 2010

Attachment and detachment

I'll admit it, as much as it may destroy my credibility.

I judge books by their covers. Not only by their covers, but by their titles. Even by the author bios (too detailed is usually a bad sign.) Especially by the typeface the author used. (I have a visceral, physical reaction to Times New Roman, that personality-devoid gray suit of fonts--and don't even get me started on the hideous cutesy crayon purée that is Comic Sans.)

Which is why I picked up Gabriel García Márquez's Love in the Time of Cholera: I've always loved the title. And the book did not disappoint: it's the kind of lush, epic story which you fall into, which wraps you up in meandering plot and gorgeous imagery. The book traces the lives of three people in a Colombian town in the Caribbean (the location is never really clear): a hopeless romantic, a levelheaded scientific, and the beautiful woman whom both pursue. It's absolutely lovely, although in a sense, it's almost too easy to become absorbed in the story and forget that none of the three self-absorbed characters is really very likeable. All are, however, very real, incredibly funny, and at times appallingly unromantic: their worst flaws coexist with the beautiful, decades-long love story like, well, cholera and love.

On the other hand, Herman Hesse's spare, short Siddhartha was a chore to get through. The novella is the iconic story of a man named Siddhartha, who encounters the Buddha and eventually attains nirvana after a winding journey through the stages of life. (I was so clueless when I started reading it that I initially thought the Siddhartha of the title was the Buddha. Confusing.) I had heard corroborated, rave reviews of this book as a life-changing masterpiece of literature.

Maybe it's my unenlightened frame of mind (I do yoga, but generally, and unfortunately, with thoughts and to-do lists swirling in my head) or my general lack of patience for allegorical tales with meanings buried beneath layers of stories about forests and animals and boat-men and rivers. Perhaps I'll pick it up again ten years from now and glean all the meaning that was supposed to burst forth like wisdom from the realized soul. But Wednesday's mindset just couldn't handle hokey phrases like "Her mouth fell open like a freshly cut fig" or the protagonist's need to refer to himself in the third person ('"Siddhartha is going to eat now,' said Siddhartha.")

Argh.

The cover, though, was beautiful.

Saturday, June 12, 2010

Gastronomers abroad

Along with a lovely, culinary-minded friend (and with the aid of this wonderful book) I spent my four months in Paris in search of what we called (only half-jokingly) "gastronomical adventures." These led us to creamy, fragrant, Italian gelatos; to crisp warm goat cheese served on tangles of green salad in iconic French bistros; to those heavenly, pillowy, marvelous, multicolored confections known as macarons; to the tartest, tangiest, Provençal tomates sechées (sundried tomatoes) and the crusty, fresh, French grandmother-made baguettes that accompanied them; and even to little hidden gems in our own residential neighborhood, from a tucked-away "soup boutique" to an Algerian pâtisserie famous for its honey-drenched, pistachio-studded baklava.

And people wonder why I miss it so much.

If said friend and I had had a patron saint on our quests, then M.F.K. Fisher, the early 20th-century food writer and poet-in-prose, would undoubtedly have been it. Although her writing is chiefly about food, equally as important are the people and memories associated with it, whether they are in Whittier, California (her hometown) or the south of France, where she lived and worked. In As They Were (one of many collections of her prose), she weaves these into little sensory vignettes ranging from cottage life in Provence to a hotel in Dijon that pipes wine directly into the rooms (chilled white before breakfast, bold red before bed--only in France!) to the "third or fourth best apple tart of [her] life." Her beautifully-constructed prose has a spiky edge, allowing her to avoid the kind of goopy sentimentalism that often plagues these sorts of memoirs. And it is carefree, worrying very little about tomorrow or yesterday, but always living very decidedly in the present, and living well indeed: the biggest concern is where the next gastronomical adventure will take place.